View Full Version : 2.0L engine specs?
dugrant153
09-21-2003, 08:50 PM
Can't seem to find much info on the 2.0L engine specs.
Just wondering what they are for the new 2.0L engine coming out for the Mazda3?
I've read it has 150hp, but how much torque?
JustMe
09-22-2003, 07:51 AM
Originally posted by dugrant153
Can't seem to find much info on the 2.0L engine specs.
Just wondering what they are for the new 2.0L engine coming out for the Mazda3?
I've read it has 150hp, but how much torque?
Here is the info for EuroSpec 2.0 but i think it comes same over there.
Bore & stroke (mm) 87,5 x 83,1
Size (ccm) 1999
Power [KW (PS) / min-1] 110 (150) / 6.000
Torque (Nm / min-1) 187 / 4.500
Compression rate 10,8 (+/-0,3) : 1
Valves 16
Top speed (km/h) 200
Acceleration (0-100km/h in sek) 9,0
wongpres
09-22-2003, 12:08 PM
The 2.0l for Euro-spec is different than N. American-spec. The Euro-spec requires premium and has a higher compression ratio.
In N. American-spec, the 2.0l:
- 148hp, 144hp PZEV in the green states
- 135lb-ft, 132lb-ft PZEV
- takes regular unleaded
dugrant153
09-22-2003, 01:12 PM
in the green states?
*confused*
kcbhiw
09-22-2003, 03:19 PM
Originally posted by dugrant153
in the green states?
*confused*
States such as California where vehicle emissions are highly monitored. Green/Hippie/Tree Hugger..you get the idea. ;)
pdhaudio83
09-22-2003, 03:28 PM
how then would u get more HP off more emissions systems...
fastdrvr23
09-22-2003, 03:40 PM
2.0 liter engine:
Type: FS-DE
Displacement: 1991cc
Cylinders: 4
Valvetrain: DOHC 16 valve
Horsepower: 130 @ 6000rpm
Torque: 135 lbs/ft @ 4000rpm
Bore & Stroke: 83 x 92mm
Compression Ratio: 9.1:1
Induction Type: Natural
Redline: 6500rpm
Alternator output: 12V, 80A
Ignition type: distributor-less coil pack
Fuel system: Multipoint EFI
Manual Transmission type: G15M-R
:)
wongpres
09-22-2003, 05:16 PM
Originally posted by fastdrvr23
2.0 liter engine:
Type: FS-DE
Displacement: 1991cc
Cylinders: 4
Valvetrain: DOHC 16 valve
Horsepower: 130 @ 6000rpm
Torque: 135 lbs/ft @ 4000rpm
Bore & Stroke: 83 x 92mm
Compression Ratio: 9.1:1
Induction Type: Natural
Redline: 6500rpm
Alternator output: 12V, 80A
Ignition type: distributor-less coil pack
Fuel system: Multipoint EFI
Manual Transmission type: G15M-R
:)
That looks like the Pro/Pro5 2.0l to me. The Mazda3 2.0l is part of a new engine family (same family as the 2.3l in the Mazda6), and has nothing to do with the Pro/Pro5 2.0l.
wongpres
09-22-2003, 05:19 PM
Originally posted by dugrant153
in the green states?
*confused*
There are 5 green states, CA and NY are the only ones that come to my mind right now, but you can look up the others. So in those states, the 2.0l will have PZEV emissions but slightly lower hp/torque numbers. All the other states, and Canada, will have the higher output number (but not PZEV obviously).
dugrant153
09-22-2003, 09:51 PM
So Canada is looking at a 2.0L with 150hp?
and the 2.3L with about 160ish hp?
fastdrvr23
09-22-2003, 10:47 PM
Originally posted by wongpres
That looks like the Pro/Pro5 2.0l to me. The Mazda3 2.0l is part of a new engine family (same family as the 2.3l in the Mazda6), and has nothing to do with the Pro/Pro5 2.0l.
You are very correct. *Slapping myself in the forehead*
I posted just a little too quick, instead of looking at the heading. My bad... Good luck in your search guys!
kcbhiw
09-22-2003, 11:01 PM
Originally posted by pdhaudio
how then would u get more HP off more emissions systems...
Restrictions (multiple cats) and recirculations (some sort of EGR like system?) I would would imagine.
JustMe
09-23-2003, 02:37 AM
Originally posted by dugrant153
So Canada is looking at a 2.0L with 150hp?
and the 2.3L with about 160ish hp?
I dont think there will be any Mazda 3 with 2.3 engine. The 2.0 is the biggest. At least I havent any talk about it and here in europe the biggest is 2.0.
dugrant153
09-23-2003, 02:42 AM
The Canada website for the Mazda 3 says that there's two engines... the 2.0L or the 2.3L... I think.
someone correct me if I'm wrong.
What I'm hoping is that Mazda will offer a base car for the same price as the current Mazda base car (17k CDN), while offering it with the 2.0L engine and 4 wheel disk brakes.
Am I just dreaming up some silly hope?
JustMe
09-23-2003, 03:12 AM
Originally posted by dugrant153
The Canada website for the Mazda 3 says that there's two engines... the 2.0L or the 2.3L... I think.
someone correct me if I'm wrong.
What I'm hoping is that Mazda will offer a base car for the same price as the current Mazda base car (17k CDN), while offering it with the 2.0L engine and 4 wheel disk brakes.
Am I just dreaming up some silly hope?
The 3 is going to be a little more expencive, at least here in europe. About 10-15% more i think(the 2.0 compared to the new 2.0) . But the price havent been released yet so everything is open.
Captain KRM P5
09-23-2003, 05:17 AM
the 2.3 liter engine in the Mazda3 is from the Mazda6i and is now in the Ford Focus
wongpres
09-23-2003, 06:25 AM
Originally posted by JustMe
I dont think there will be any Mazda 3 with 2.3 engine. The 2.0 is the biggest. At least I havent any talk about it and here in europe the biggest is 2.0.
N. America, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand are the only markets getting the 2.3l
wongpres
09-23-2003, 06:30 AM
Originally posted by dugrant153
So Canada is looking at a 2.0L with 150hp?
and the 2.3L with about 160ish hp?
N. America, the 2.0l will have 148hp and 160hp, so yes, they're quite close in performance. However, the 2.3l will have more torque and has variable valve timing.
The reason for the close engines is the next lower Mazda3 engine would be a 1.6l. And although the 1.6l Mazda3 has been getting good Euro-reviews (even better than the 2.0l), it would be too low a displacement for N. America (I mean, how could MazdaUSA explain going from the Pro 2.0l down to a 1.6l).
B.L. Zebop
09-23-2003, 07:42 AM
Mazda 3 sedan...all but the high-end model will have the 2.0L. Mazda 3 sedan top of the line model plus all Mazda 3 hatchbacks will have the 2.3L.
Sedan will be quickest, as I presume, like the current Protege and Protege-5, the sedan will be the lighter of the two.
nomahh
09-28-2003, 05:12 PM
Originally posted by kcbhiw
States such as California where vehicle emissions are highly monitored. Green/Hippie/Tree Hugger..you get the idea. ;)
Nice use of Bush logic.
The "hippie" car has higher output specs. Guess those hippies know something you don't? ;)
kcbhiw
09-28-2003, 11:34 PM
Originally posted by nomahh
Nice use of Bush logic.
The "hippie" car has higher output specs. Guess those hippies know something you don't? ;)
Actually, I was defining a "green state", not the power output of the car. Nice way to overlook details ;) j/k.
cortez
09-29-2003, 02:46 PM
Originally posted by nomahh
Nice use of Bush logic.
The "hippie" car has higher output specs. Guess those hippies know something you don't? ;)
Huh?
This is what is posted above:
"In N. American-spec, the 2.0l:
- 148hp, 144hp PZEV in the green states
- 135lb-ft, 132lb-ft PZEV
- takes regular unleaded"
The "hippie" motor makes 4 less hp and 3 less foot pounds of torque.
vBulletin® v3.6.7, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.